AUGUST 6, 2006ÑWorld Trade Center is not the 9/11 film anyone expected from Oliver Stone.
The controversial director of JFK and Nixon dispenses with the politics and conspiracy theories to tell the little-known true story of two Port Authority police officers rescued from the rubble of the Twin Towers.
Sgt. John McLoughlin and Officer Will Jimeno (played, respectively, by Nicolas Cage and CrashÕs Michael Pe–a) found themselves buried under the World Trade Center while trying to assist people fleeing the North Tower. They remained trapped for 12 hours before they were eventually found and pulled to safety.
Stone also recounts how their wivesÑDonna McLoughlin and Allison McLoughlin (played, respectively, by Maria Bello and Maggie Gyllenhaal)Ñcoped with the possibility that they died when the World Trade Center collapsed.
Prior to World Trade CenterÕs Aug. 9 release, Stone visited Miami to discuss the new film he made to inspire rather than ignite tempers. Here are Stone's comments on:
Whether audiences are ready to relive Sept. 11, 2001
I canÕt tell you that. I can only tell you weÕd better be because the consequences of that day are far worse than what happened on that day. ThereÕs been far more death through terror, more terror, more fear. We have constitutional breakdowns in this country. We have huge debts. On Sept. 12 [2001] É people felt sorry for us. There was a feeling [of empathy] throughout the world, and we were in a different place that day. We helped each other day. We were united, we were really pulling to over the suffering and the setback, and I think thatÕs important to Will and John. ThatÕs why theyÕre telling this story. Where are we now?
Choosing to direct World Trade Center
In its origin it came to me as a script. It was an inspiring story. And it was true. I talked to people. I checked it out. We talked to everybody. ItÕs very rare to find a script tat you read and sit there and say, This one I want to do. [Stanley] Kubrick once said that you should be aware the first time you read the screenplay because many years will go by, many readings, many drafts, but the first reading is very important to remember. And I remember that first reading, it hit my heart in a way I hope I never forget. It wasnÕt a movie yet; it was a great idea, a great inspiration. With [screenwriter Andrea Berloff], we broke it down, we sent it to the sawmill, everything changed around at some point, and what came out is the result of this collaboration. ItÕs the nature of the business. I always work as a writer or a co-writer, or IÕm not interested in credit.
World Trade Center being an atypical Oliver Stone film
This is all pigeonholing me. I understand that. The same methods went into this movie which I always have used, which is realism, talking to the witnesses, following up the facts, and I include JFK in that because we talked to a hell of lot of witnesses who were at Dealey Plaza and all the other places, in Washington. ThatÕs my style, but IÕve always blended it with other aspects, whether it was a subject or sometimes a style. Because each time IÕve tried to suit the style to the movie. And if you look closely at the movie, you can see the style has changed. ThereÕs a big difference, for example, between Natural Born Killers, which was 1994, and Heaven and Earth, which was Õ93. Heaven and Earth was shot in a classical style, which is very much like this style. And IÕve gone back and forth. Nixon was shot in a different style than JFK. Alexander was shot in a more classical style, too.
Deliberately avoiding Oliver Stone-isms
The worse thing that I could do, and I said this for this movie, is to let the character called Oliver Stone come between the audience and the film. It would be a disservice to the people in the film. And I would say the same thing if I was doing the JFK murder. But it happened, and my name grew through the years, and it came something other than what I am, which is what I am, but thereÕs IÕve had to deal that thereÕs an Oliver Stone out there, but thatÕs not me. The next movie that I do, itÕs going to be the same way.
The process of directing World Trade Center
It was not shot with reverence. It wasnÕt like each time we did a shot we bowed down to the Holy Grail and said, Bless us, O Father because weÕre dealing with a holy ritual here. Not at all. We dealt with it the same way we always do. We had with us the best. The people were fresh, the memories were fresh, the police and firemanÑthe Port Authority especially, because this is a Port Authority filmÑwere most helpful. The rescuing issue was filled with confusion because the day was filled with confusion. But we checked out the stories and we had enormous technical nightmares trying to match it. So much the Fire Department did this, the Police Department did this, the Port Authority did that. If you notice closely, the rescue of Will is done by Scotty Struass, who is a NYPD (Emergency Service Unit officer). The rescue of John, he was discovered by Scotty Fox of the Fire Department, who plays himself. So naturally thereÕs tension between departments. They all want to do their best to get down there to help. They stepped on each otherÕs toes constantly. By the way, most of the rescuers were mixed. By the time you get to the paramedics they would be from different unitsÉ. And when you saw John coming out of the hole in the daylight, that is based on a documentary shot we saw of. Literally all those uniforms were different. A hundred different uniforms in the document, we tried to match it.
Light vs. darkness
The idea was that [McLoughlin and Jimeno] were plunged into the Hades world, the darkness from the light of the morningÉ. The light comes up, and then we lose the light, they go into the darkness. To get out of that gloomÑno audience could sit through a dark film; we had 35 minutes of hole at the end of the day, we made them into nine holes, averages out four minutes perÑweÕd get out of the holes to go to the light. The light in the homes was intended to be a contract. So, at first, it was really light, but then as the day dims and the chances of their husband coming home, we took the daylight into a more threatening aspect, into the somberness of the twilight. Corresponding, when we go back to the later holes, theyÕve warmed up a bit because the fires are getting more intense. So thereÕs a little more warmth in the holes; that theyÕre getting closer to the light. At the very end, of course, Nic comes out into the light.
Refraining from showing much of the horror of Sept. 11, 2001
Jumping out of the building. YouÕve seen footage of it. We could have done a lot more. It was necessary, though [to include a scene of someone jumping from the World Trade Center]. You have to take into account that people who see this film are not just people who know this event. There are people who donÕt know about the event, peasants in Peru or young people who were 7 years old at the time and didnÕt know what it was all about. All kids who are born today who are going to see it in 10 years, 15 years. You have to take this into account, and you want to at least some information you have to shareÉ. We didnÕt use any real footage stock so as not to offend. Who knows who can spot who there? So we create that via computer. The only time we created computer images outside the TV was the burning buildings and the jumper, one time. TV images are all real and real voices. They are chronologically correct. That occurs at that time of day.
Securing a PG-13 rating
My ideal would to be make a PG-13, and no oneÕs congratulated me yetÉ. It wasnÕt necessary to swear. There are some swear words in there, but it wasnÕt necessary. The pain is sufficient. You see how graphic it is. I think the code has become more liberal, but whatever happens, we did preview, the kids 13 to 16 loved the movie. ThereÕs a bigger audience there. Thirteen year olds want to know what happened that day.
Earning the PG-13 rating
What I was worried about was the same problem I had on Natural Born Killers. (The Motion Picture Association of America) would simply say a generality such as, This is too intense. Then you end up stripping your movie of the things that make it. The movie is a fine line between É itÕs clean in the sense that the grit is not overwhelming. You want the grandmother to see it with the kid. It is painful. There are moments that will take her eyes away, maybe. But I tested it with my daughter, my wife, several Korean family members, some of whom are very squeamish. Various other people. So I got a feeling of where the line was.
Casting Nicolas Cage as John McLoughlin
He looks a bit like (McLoughlin). Nic, I had been told, was wanting to do something serious like this. HeÕs very intense. HeÕs very sensitive, more than you perhaps think. HeÕs torn. HeÕs a very emotional person, and heÕs made huge contributions to Amnesty, but heÕs done it quietly. He has a big social conscience in his way. The thing is, he works ferociously. HeÕs obsessed with work. He looks at it as an exploration, as a science. He does movies to test some new aspect of himself. So he experiments far more than most actors.
He was a head in the jar. He couldnÕt move. And also he had to be very straight. It wasnÕt the normal Nic Cage. McLoughlin É is hardly as colorful as John Wayne. HeÕs more like Ward Bond. How do you make a life out of the Ward Bond character?
The time and cost to make World Trade Center
I would say itÕs a moderate Hollywood film. It was done in 63 days É it was expensive to build the sets. Absolutely. We built the rubble field exterior in Los AngelesÑPlaya del RayÑand we built the interior holes. ItÕs very hard to work in rubble. Just to walk in rubble. When I walked to the World Trade Center, itÕs exhausting after an hour. You have the light the damn thing, you bring cameras in, you have to bring crews, you have to have access, actors have to come and go. ItÕs a very complicated technical process.
It was a big build. We shot a third in New York, two-thirds in L.A. The budget was medium by the standards of Hollywood: $63 million.
Accusations of turning tragedy into profit
How do you make something like this? How do you get peopleÑcrewsÑto work? TheyÕll take the money; we need some salaries to keep going. We need a year, a year-and-a-half of our lives. Everyone on the film worked harder than usual. They always work hard, but they went beyond the ordinary. The actors didnÕt take anything close to their normal fees. I didnÕt. The only way to possibly make some money to justify the long period is to take a profit, is to take a piece of the backend. If you look at Titanic, Pearl Harbor, all the movies that are made about historical (disasters), The Battle of Algiers, how would you get those movies made unless there was some kind of profit? People are not work totally for free. Even the people building the memorial are getting paid. You give back any way you can. Paramount is giving back more even than United 93. TheyÕre giving back 10 percent of the first five days to four charities. ThatÕs a big gross. Each person will do what they feel. If it works out, IÕll give back something a percentageÉ. IÕm sure Nic will.
The rumors of a Wall Street sequel
I was and IÕm not anymore. Those rumors are random. While weÕre at it, letÕs get rid of some other rumors. What else? Custer (The Son of the Morning Star)? No.
World Trade Center is now in theaters. Click here for more information.
Click the links below to read World Trade Center interviews with:
ÑMaggie Gyllenhaal
ÑMichael Pe–a
ÑWill Jimeno
ÑAllison Jimeno
Back to top |